Tuesday 10 January 2012

Feedback for 'Million Dollar Punch (Re-Make)'

Feedback
Ø Title sequence are strangely ordered e.g: actors and camera crew are mixed up to create no order.
Ø The Overall filming of it gives out more of a professional look about it than the last one.
Ø The fight scenes have been focused on more therefore making a more realistic view of the fight
Ø A small part of the music stops and letting the fluent movement of the music break.
Ø  Black & White suites the movie really, gives out an emotional edge that fighting films usually give out.
Ø The text at the start goes a bit too fast, therefore making it hard for the audience to take in.
Ø Looks like a British film, in terms of rough edged action to give out the british feel of other British fighting films.
Ø When the first character was introduced, it seemed not normal as he was putting tape on in a living room, rather than in gym.
Ø Make the blood more clear to see, as the audience may not no what it is. Try to add more 'bloody' texture to it, so looks more realistic.


We shall take this into consideration for our next extended version of this. To answer some of the feedback we shall note below...


1. How we made it look more 'professional'?
We made it more professional as we took in all the feedback from our first draft we did and improved upon our mistakes. We also added more punches as we felt that the previous 'punching scenes' were not up to the realistic standards that we were hoping for.


2.The reason for the 'music stumbling'?
The music stumbles as we had some technical problems with our music software. Rudi try to amend this but it did not work. In future filming projects we shall fix this more in advance next time.


3.Why the 'First character was introduced in a living room'?
We introduced the first character in a living room as it showed that he, as character is rich with money and that the other character is poor and cannot afford decent shelter. So maybe next time the audience can take that into consideration.







1 comment:

  1. You need to read this post through and correct the spelling and grammar errors, Danny. Don't forget that Blogger has a spell check...use it.

    ReplyDelete